Key events
Lisa Nandy denies major rebellion brewing over government’s welfare reform plans
A major rebellion is not brewing over the government’s welfare reform plans, Lisa Nandy said on Friday.
Asked by BBC Breakfast if she was detecting signs of a large rebellion, the culture secretary replied:
I’m not. It would be wrong to say that when you bring forward big reforms, there aren’t concerns and there aren’t dissenting voices, of course there are.
But Vicky [Foxcroft] is the only frontbencher that I’ve had a conversation with about resigning.
Asked how many backbench Labour MPs had approached her with worries about the plans, Nandy said:
A handful have expressed concerns about the detail, and I’m really confident that we’ve listened and we’ve put forward a package that is absolutely right.
In a seperate interview with Times Radio, Nandy said Vicky Foxcroft “did the honourable thing” by resigning over the government’s planned welfare cuts.
Asked about the resignation of Foxcroft, Nandy replied:
I know Vicky very well, and she is the only frontbencher that I’ve had any discussions with about her resigning.
I know that she really wrestled with the decision, and there’s no disagreement between us on the principle of wanting to help people who can work to get work, and protecting those who can’t ever work, and making sure that we reform the system so that it works for everybody.
No disagreement on the principle, but there is a disagreement on the practicalities and on the policy, and I think she’s done the honourable thing.
If you can’t stick with collective responsibility in government, you have to resign.
She’s done the honourable thing. It will enable her to have a voice, and she – as the former shadow disabilities minister – is very keen to use it.
But I think most Labour MPs, including her, agree with the principle of the reforms that we’re making.
Lisa Nandy said she hopes to see the assisted dying bill clear the House of Commons on Friday and continue its progress to becoming law, reports the PA news agency.
The culture secretary was asked by Sky News if she had changed her mind about supporting the bill, after a group of Labour MPs announced they would now be voting against after previously offering support.
“I’m still a supporter of this bill. I’ve had a longstanding personal commitment to change the law on assisted dying with appropriate safeguards. And I think there has been a very considered and respectful debate over the last few months on all sides,” Nandy told the broadcaster.
The cabinet minister said she respected “the views of colleagues who take a different view”, adding:
I hope the bill succeeds today. If it does pass the House of Commons stages, of course it will go on to the House of Lords, where there will be more debate and there may be more changes.
But I have believed as an individual – not as a government because we don’t take a view – but as an individual for a long time, that the law needs to change and I continue to hold that position.
The relatively narrow majority of 55 from the historic yes vote in November means every vote will count on Friday.
As an example, the assisted dying bill would fall if 28 MPs switched directly from voting yes to no, but only if all other MPs voted exactly the same way as they did in November, including those who abstained, reports the PA news agency.
MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the bill, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines.
The debate in the Commons is scheduled to start at 9.30am, with the vote expected in the mid-afternoon.
A YouGov poll of 2,003 adults in Great Britain, surveyed last month and published on Thursday, suggested public support for the bill remains high at 73% – unchanged from November.
The proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle has risen slightly, to 75% from 73% in November.
MPs prepare for crunch vote on assisted dying bill on Friday
Assisted dying could move a step closer to becoming law in England and Wales as parliament prepares for a crunch vote on the issue.
The outcome on Friday could see the terminally ill adults (end of life) bill either clear the House of Commons and move to the House of Lords, or fall completely. The debate will begin at 9.30am.
In what will be seen as a blow to the bill, four Labour MPs confirmed on the eve of the vote that they will switch sides to oppose the proposed new law, reports the PA news agency.
Labour’s Paul Foster, Jonathan Hinder, Markus Campbell-Savours and Kanishka Narayan wrote to fellow MPs to voice concerns about the safety of the proposed legislation. They called it “drastically weakened”, citing the scrapping of the high court judge safeguard as a key reason.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch also urged her MPs to vote against the legislation, describing it as “a bad bill” despite being “previously supportive of assisted suicide”.
As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater has insisted the replacement of high court judge approval with the multidisciplinary panels is a strengthening of the legislation, incorporating wider expert knowledge to assess assisted dying applications.
Ahead of confirmation of the four vote-switchers, Leadbeater acknowledged she expected “some small movement in the middle” but that she did not “anticipate that that majority would be heavily eroded”.
She insisted her bill is “the most robust piece of legislation in the world” and has argued dying people must be given choice at the end of their lives in a conversation which has seen support from high-profile figures including Esther Rantzen.
Leadbeater has warned it could be a decade before assisted dying legislation returns to parliament if MPs vote to reject her bill on Friday.
Meanwhile, culture secretary Lisa Nandy has been on the media rounds this morning talking about this topic and sharing her support for the bill. More on this in a moment, but first here is a summary of the latest UK politics news:
-
Higher tax receipts were unable to prevent a rise in public sector borrowing in May to £17.7bn, up from £17bn a year earlier and the second highest for the month on record. A poll of City economists had forecast public sector net borrowing – the difference between public spending and income – would be £17.1bn. The figures will add to the concerns that the government is struggling to bring down the annual deficit to keep within strict spending rules.
-
Thousands of European airline staff are being trained to stop people boarding flights to Britain without valid visas, in a move billed by the foreign secretary as a digital upgrade to border controls. David Lammy said the measures marked a step towards “more secure, more digital and more effective” borders, but the move could raise questions about human rights safeguards.
-
Cuts of £5bn to the UK overseas aid budget cannot be challenged in the courts, government lawyers have said, even though ministers have no plan to return spending to the legal commitment of 0.7 % of UK gross national income (GNI).
-
The Labour MP Vicky Foxcroft has resigned as a whip in protest at the government’s welfare plans, saying she will not be able to vote for the cuts to disability payments.
-
Children in England face prolonged “lost learning” caused by extreme heat and flooding at school, according to research on the potential impact of the climate crisis on education. School leaders and teachers said the scenarios published by the Department for Education made for grim reading and urged ministers to move quickly to improve school resilience.
